30-다음-글의-밑줄-친-부분-중-문맥상-낱말의-쓰임이-적절하지-않은-것은-3점-lets-return-time-in-which-photographs-were-not-in-livin

Question

30. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지
않은 것은? [3점]
Let's return to a time in which photographs were not in
living color. During that period, people referred to pictures
as "photographs" rather than "black-and-white photographs" as
we do today. The possibility of color did not exist, so it
was ① unnecessary to insert the adjective "black-and-white."
However, suppose we did include the phrase "black-and-white"
before the existence of color photography. By ② highlighting
that reality, we become conscious of current limitations and
thus open our minds to new possibilities and potential
opportunities. World War I was given that name only ③ after
we were deeply embattled in World War II. Before that
horrific period of the 1940s, World War I was simply called
"The Great War" or, even worse, "The War to End All
Wars." What if we had called it "World War I" back in
1918? Such a label might have made the possibility of □□□□□.

Qanda AI · Answer

문맥상 ‘World War I’를 미리 그렇게 부르면 ‘제2차 세계대전’이 벌어질 가능성을 암시하게 되어 오히려 **예측 가능한** 상황이 된다. 그런데도 밑줄 친

문제 이해