질문
문제 이해
[36~37] 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것
을 고르시오.
36.
Toward the end of the 19th century, a new architectural
attitude emerged. Industrial architecture, the argument
went, was ugly and inhuman; past styles had more to do
with pretension than what people needed in their homes.
(A) But they supplied people's needs perfectly and, at their
best, had a beauty that came from the craftsman's skill
and the rootedness of the house in its locality.
(B) Instead of these approaches, why not look at the way
ordinary country builders worked in the past? They
developed their craft skills over generations, demonstrating
mastery of both tools and materials.
(C) Those materials were local, and used with simplicity —
houses built this way had plain wooden floors □□□□□
풀이 전략
맥락을 파악하여 문장 간 연결 관계를 살펴보고 이어질 글의 흐름을 자연스럽게 배치한다.
풀이
위의 설명이 충분하지 않다면,
설명과 정답을 더 확인해보세요
Integer a semper turpis. Morbi ut leo in metus hendrerit aliquam et nec tortor. Morbi mollis aliquet tempor. Donec condimentum lacinia libero, vel feugiat dui lacinia nec. Morbi vel mauris in ex pretium gravida quis vel diam. Quisque porta nulla at elementum elementum. Vivamus rhoncus lectus id diam consectetur posuere.
Quisque vehicula est ut condimentum viverra. Quisque ut nibh aliquet, egestas urna sit amet, malesuada leo. Ut auctor iaculis quam ac ultricies. Curabitur a mi sem.
Quisque aliquet viverra orci et mollis. Pellentesque neque mauris, bibendum sed auctor id, vulputate eu orci. Ut egestas laoreet sem, sit amet consequat eros malesuada quis. Etiam tempus dictum lacus, vel ullamcorper nisi laoreet at. Donec eu mauris non arcu volutpat interdum. Nulla sagittis erat ut auctor sollicitudin. Pellentesque vulputate feugiat eleifend. Quisque ullamcorper venenatis leo vel gravida. Nam eu semper leo.
유사 문제와 풀이
3